XML.com: XUL-Enhanced Web Apps
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2007/01/31/xul-enhanced-web-apps.html#myPanel-tabPanel1
Umm... sure, if you want your web app to look and behave *entirely* different under Mozilla versus other browsers.
hyperstruct blog Exchanging Data Between Chrome and Content
http://blog.hyperstruct.net/2006/08/18/exchanging-data-between-chrome-and-content
"Scenario: a chrome and a content application are aware of their respective existence and wish to communicate. Communication should be able to flow both ways."
celtx - Overview
http://www.celtx.com/overview.html
"Celtx is software for making media - film, video, theatre, and animation."
Continuing Intermittent Incoherency » ajaxWrong
http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=551
"A XUL app being billed as “Ajax” is just as laughable as a Flex or XAML app suddenly growing the same moniker. That it’s Mozilla’s walled-garden language doesn’t really excuse the gaffe."
SitePoint Blogs - Is AJAX Cross-Browser?
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/24/is-ajax-cross-browser
"Rather than using cross-browser DHTML like Writely, ajaxWrite uses Extensible User Interface Language (XUL), which means it will only work on Mozilla browsers like Firefox. Alex Russell believes that advertising such an application using the AJAX name is