<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #xul</title>
    <link>/tags/xul/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #xul</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>XML.com: XUL-Enhanced Web Apps</title>
      <link>http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2007/01/31/xul-enhanced-web-apps.html#myPanel-tabPanel1</link>
      <description>Umm... sure, if you want your web app to look and behave *entirely* different under Mozilla versus other browsers.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #dhtml #firefox #mozilla #webdev #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:8592</guid>
      <category>dhtml</category>
      <category>firefox</category>
      <category>mozilla</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hyperstruct blog Exchanging Data Between Chrome and Content</title>
      <link>http://blog.hyperstruct.net/2006/08/18/exchanging-data-between-chrome-and-content</link>
      <description>&#34;Scenario: a chrome and a content application are aware of their respective existence and wish to communicate. Communication should be able to flow both ways.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #js #mozilla #webdev #xml #xmpp4moz #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:8429</guid>
      <category>js</category>
      <category>mozilla</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>xml</category>
      <category>xmpp4moz</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>celtx - Overview</title>
      <link>http://www.celtx.com/overview.html</link>
      <description>&#34;Celtx is software for making media - film, video, theatre, and animation.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #screenplays #writing #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:8038</guid>
      <category>screenplays</category>
      <category>writing</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Continuing Intermittent Incoherency » ajaxWrong</title>
      <link>http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=551</link>
      <description>&#34;A XUL app being billed as “Ajax” is just as laughable as a Flex or XAML app suddenly growing the same moniker. That it’s Mozilla’s walled-garden language doesn’t really excuse the gaffe.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ajax #ajaxwrite #morons #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:6717</guid>
      <category>ajax</category>
      <category>ajaxwrite</category>
      <category>morons</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SitePoint Blogs - Is AJAX Cross-Browser?</title>
      <link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/24/is-ajax-cross-browser</link>
      <description>&#34;Rather than using cross-browser DHTML like Writely, ajaxWrite uses Extensible User Interface Language (XUL), which means it will only work on Mozilla browsers like Firefox. Alex Russell believes that advertising such an application using the AJAX name is&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ajax #ajaxwrite #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:6715</guid>
      <category>ajax</category>
      <category>ajaxwrite</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
