<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #testicles</title>
    <link>/tags/testicles/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #testicles</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Do Tags Work?</title>
      <link>http://www.tekka.net/10/tags.html</link>
      <description>If you can get past the rambling paragraphs of awkward fun-poking at tags interspersed with library science / web 2.0 / cultural references—as well as a discovery of what, you know, Flickr is all about—there&#39;s a well-embellished and obsessively-assembled statistical analysis of tags vs title vs notes in finding photos featuring tourist heel-spinning on the testicles of a bull mosaic in Milan.  My impression is that she&#39;s missed the point of tags, but I&#39;m having trouble reducing the impression to a critique.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #bulls #didread #essays #heelspins #metadata #milan #obsessions #photos #search #tags #testicles #tl;dr&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:11845</guid>
      <category>bulls</category>
      <category>didread</category>
      <category>essays</category>
      <category>heelspins</category>
      <category>metadata</category>
      <category>milan</category>
      <category>obsessions</category>
      <category>photos</category>
      <category>search</category>
      <category>tags</category>
      <category>testicles</category>
      <category>tl;dr</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
