<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #nukes</title>
    <link>/tags/nukes/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #nukes</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Proposal: keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer&#39;s chest-cavity / Boing Boing</title>
      <link>http://boingboing.net/2015/12/11/proposal-keep-the-nuclear-lau.html</link>
      <description>what if the codes to launch nuclear war were kept inside the chest-cavity of a young volunteer, and the President would have to hack them out of this young man&#39;s chest before he could commence armageddon?&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #imported:pinboard #nuclear #nukes #war&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:26111</guid>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>nuclear</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>war</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama May Ditch Most US Nukes | Mother Jones</title>
      <link>http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/nuclear-weapons-reduction-obama</link>
      <description>Will Republicans accede to a sweeping drawdown of US nuclear might? Beyond the knee-jerk emotions on top national security issues, there&#39;s an awful lot of defense pork—not just missiles, but also bombers, submarines, and scientific research—bound up in our nuclear program. That makes the most dramatic reduction scenarios highly unlikely to pass muster in Congress. But if the White House and Pentagon push one of their more modest proposals—cutting the number of bombs to, say, 700 or 1,000—that could represent a reasonable compromise that still offers compelling financial savings and progress toward greater global stability. Faced with a plan like that, resistant congressmen might end up looking like just a bunch of Dr. Strangeloves.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #imported:pinboard #military #nukes #politics #us&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:20802</guid>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>military</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>us</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Daily Kos: Herman Cain warns China trying to get nukes they&#39;ve had since 1960s</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/02/1032454/-Herman-Cain-warns-China-trying-to-get-nukes-theyve-had-since-1960s</link>
      <description>JUDY WOODRUFF: Do you view China as a potential military threat to the United States?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HERMAN CAIN: I do view China as a potential military threat to the United States. [...] They&#39;ve indicated that they&#39;re trying to develop nuclear capability and they want to develop more aircraft carriers like we have. So yes, we have to consider them a military threat.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #china #hermancain #nukes #politics&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:19312</guid>
      <category>china</category>
      <category>hermancain</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bush&#39;s &#39;Axis of Evil&#39; Comes Back to Haunt United States - washingtonpost.com</title>
      <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/09/AR2006100901130.html</link>
      <description>&#34;We started with Iraq in the &#39;axis of evil&#39; side, when we thought they did not yet have nuclear weapons, and that sent the signal to others that they better get them quick&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #axisofevil #bush #nukes #oops #politics #war&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:7866</guid>
      <category>axisofevil</category>
      <category>bush</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>oops</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>war</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let&#39;s Talk About Nukes - Why we must continue to negotiate with Pyongyang and Tehran. By Fred Kaplan</title>
      <link>http://slate.msn.com/id/2124544/fr/rss</link>
      <description>&#34;The tragedy of this saga is that President Bush could as easily have started these talks in 2002, when North Korea&#39;s fuel rods were still under the lock and surveillance of international inspectors.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #bush #iran #korea #nukes #politics&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:5186</guid>
      <category>bush</category>
      <category>iran</category>
      <category>korea</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Onion | U.S. Intelligence: Nukehavistan May Have Nuclear Weapons</title>
      <link>http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4133&amp;n=1</link>
      <description>&#39;...commemorative &#34;Great Nuclear Weapons Of Nukehavistan&#34; stamp series...&#39;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #funny #nukes #theonion #war&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:5183</guid>
      <category>funny</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>theonion</category>
      <category>war</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FOXNews.com - Politics - Tancredo: If They Nuke Us, Bomb Mecca</title>
      <link>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162795,00.html</link>
      <description>And so, we make an enemy of the entire Islamic culture for a few thousand years.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #islam #morons #nukes #politics #terror #terrorism #war&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:5012</guid>
      <category>islam</category>
      <category>morons</category>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>terror</category>
      <category>terrorism</category>
      <category>war</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Atomic Club: If the Bomb Is So Easy to Make, Why Don’t More Nations Have It?</title>
      <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/04/weekinreview/04east.html??ei=5062&amp;en=d19dbdf1fad7763f&amp;ex=1068267600&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;position=&amp;position=</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #nukes #politics&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:1348</guid>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Observers Fault U.S. for Pursuing Mini-Nukes</title>
      <link>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?cid=2026&amp;e=1&amp;ncid=2026&amp;tmpl=story&amp;u=/latimes_ts/20031223/ts_latimes/observersfaultusforpursuingmininukes</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #nukes #politics #war&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:1281</guid>
      <category>nukes</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>war</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
