<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #nowww</title>
    <link>/tags/nowww/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #nowww</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>no-www considered harmful - defunct</title>
      <link>http://www.less-broken.com/blog/2012/05/no-www-considered-harmful.html</link>
      <description>I remember reading about the no-www movement years ago. At that time it struck me as a cool thing to do, but I now know that no-www is a really bad idea in general. That’s because the DNS system lets you assign CNAME records to subdomains, including the www subdomain, but only A or AAAA records to root domains. In other words, you can say that www.example.com is the same as test.example.org, but you can only say that example.com is the same as a particular IP address.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #dns #imported:pinboard #nowww #webdev&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:21699</guid>
      <category>dns</category>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>nowww</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
