<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #monopoly</title>
    <link>/tags/monopoly/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #monopoly</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Monopoly auction rule: Official? Yes. Smart? No.</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/06/03/monopoly_auction_rule_official_yes_smart_no.html</link>
      <description>An old blog post about an “unknown” Monopoly rule has been making its way around the Web the past few days, starting with a piece on BuzzFeed, then spreading to MSN, Yahoo, HuffPo, and a slew of other places. The gist is simple: When landing on a property, you’re allowed to auction it off, with the highest bidder paying the bank, rather than just purchasing it yourself.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #funny #gaming #imported:pinboard #monopoly #to:fb&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:23745</guid>
      <category>funny</category>
      <category>gaming</category>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>monopoly</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why ‘too big to fail’ is too much for us to take</title>
      <link>http://www.johnkay.com/politics/611</link>
      <description>&#34;There should be a clear distinction in public policy between the requirement for essential activities to survive and the continued existence of particular companies engaged in their provision.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #capitalism #democracy #economics #failure #infrastructure #monopoly #socialism #toobigtofail&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:12280</guid>
      <category>capitalism</category>
      <category>democracy</category>
      <category>economics</category>
      <category>failure</category>
      <category>infrastructure</category>
      <category>monopoly</category>
      <category>socialism</category>
      <category>toobigtofail</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blogzilla: DRM-a-go-go</title>
      <link>http://dooooooom.blogspot.com/2006/01/drm-go-go.html</link>
      <description>&#34;We don&#39;t want this technology to be available to every hobbyist. We need to keep the number of licensees down to a manageable number. We charge a license fee to keep the number of people we have to deal with down to a level we can handle.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #MSFT #anticompetitive #copyfight #drm #microsoft #monopoly&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:6211</guid>
      <category>MSFT</category>
      <category>anticompetitive</category>
      <category>copyfight</category>
      <category>drm</category>
      <category>microsoft</category>
      <category>monopoly</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
