<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #economy</title>
    <link>/tags/economy/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #economy</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Endowment effect - Wikipedia</title>
      <link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect</link>
      <description>In psychology and behavioral economics, the endowment effect, also known as divestiture aversion, is the finding that people are more likely to retain an object they own than acquire that same object when they do not own it.[1][2][3][4] The endowment theory can be defined as &#34;an application of prospect theory positing that loss aversion associated with ownership explains observed exchange asymmetries.&#34;[5]&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #economy #psychology&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:38456</guid>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>psychology</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Durable Consumables - Travers Nisbet</title>
      <link>https://travers.fyi/durables?ref=sidebar</link>
      <description>The frontier keeps moving. Progress keeps accelerating. The rational response is shorter time horizons, faster replacement cycles, less investment in permanence. I understand the logic. I just wonder what we lose when fewer objects around us are built with the assumption that they&#39;ll still be here, still working, still ours, decades from now.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #design #economy #future #tech&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:38058</guid>
      <category>design</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>tech</category>
      <enclosure url="https://links.lmorchard.com/static/0fdf5d6000f218feae3f467f3a5b2edf.png" type="image/png"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI isn&#39;t replacing jobs. AI spending is - Fast Company</title>
      <link>https://www.fastcompany.com/91435192/chatgpt-llm-openai-jobs-amazon</link>
      <description>We have been following the slow growth in revenues for generative AI over the last few years, and the revenues are neither big enough to support the number of layoffs attributed to AI, nor to justify the capital expenditures on AI cloud infrastructure. Those expenditures may be approaching $1 trillion for 2025, while AI revenue—which would be used to pay for the use of AI infrastructure to run the software—will not exceed $30 billion this year. Are we to believe that such a small amount of revenue is driving economy-wide layoffs?&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ai #economy #layoffs #llms #tech&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:37937</guid>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>layoffs</category>
      <category>llms</category>
      <category>tech</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Everyone&#39;s wondering if, and when, the AI bubble will pop. Here&#39;s what went down 25 years ago that ultimately burst the dot-com boom | Fortune</title>
      <link>https://fortune.com/2025/09/28/ai-dot-com-bubble-parallels-history-explained-companies-revenue-infrastructure/</link>
      <description>The question facing investors today isn’t whether AI will transform the economy—most experts agree it will. The question is whether current valuations and infrastructure investments can be justified by near-term returns, or whether, like the fiber-optic cables of the 1990s, much of today’s AI infrastructure will sit unused while the market awaits demand to catch up with supply. As history shows, even transformative technologies can’t escape the gravitational pull of economics—so while the internet did change the world, it didn’t happen as quickly as some of its early champions promised, and several of those people who got ahead of themselves were humbled in the process.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ai #bubbles #dotcom #economy #history #llms&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:37762</guid>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>bubbles</category>
      <category>dotcom</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>history</category>
      <category>llms</category>
      <enclosure url="https://links.lmorchard.com/static/841a9b293724aea747368eeaede3a258.jpg" type="image/jpeg"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elizabeth Warren: &#34;There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own&#34; - CBS News</title>
      <link>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elizabeth-warren-there-is-nobody-in-this-country-who-got-rich-on-his-own/</link>
      <description>Warren rejects the concept that it is possible for Americans to become wealthy in isolation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#34;You built a factory out there? Good for you,&#34; she says. &#34;But I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn&#39;t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did.&#34;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;She continues: &#34;Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea? God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #america #capitalism #economy #politics #warren&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:29866</guid>
      <category>america</category>
      <category>capitalism</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>warren</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dead Labor, Dead Speech - by Nicholas Carr</title>
      <link>https://www.newcartographies.com/p/dead-labor-dead-speech</link>
      <description>If, as Marx argued, capital is dead labor, then the products of large language models might best be understood as dead speech. Just as factory workers produce, with their “living labor,” machines and other forms of physical capital that are then used, as “dead labor,” to produce more physical commodities, so human expressions of thought and creativity—“living speech” in the forms of writing, art, photography, and music—become raw materials used to produce “dead speech” in those same forms. LLMs, to continue with Marx’s horror-story metaphor, feed “vampire-like” on human culture. Without our words and pictures and songs, they would cease to function. They would become as silent as a corpse in a casket.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ai #creativity #economy #genai #llm #ml #writing&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:29883</guid>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>creativity</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>genai</category>
      <category>llm</category>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>writing</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Before You Can Have Smalltalk, You Must First Defeat Capitalism. — Matthew Gaudet</title>
      <link>https://www.mgaudet.ca/blog/2024/10/28/before-you-can-have-smalltalk-you-must-first-defeat-capitalism</link>
      <description>The title of this blog post is at least a little sarcastic, but I think is an honest to goodness truth: If you want to build a future that involves beautiful systems like Smalltalk, you must first rebuild the economic environment wherein it could be built. Wherein it could succeed! These systems idealized in lamentations at SPLASH all seem to me to be products of economic surplus combined with the right people. We need an economy that has surpluses around for people to do explorations.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #compsci #economy #programming #smalltalk&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:29942</guid>
      <category>compsci</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>smalltalk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How the internet is making us poor – Quartz</title>
      <link>http://qz.com/67323/how-the-internet-made-us-poor/</link>
      <description>Barring a civilization-ending event, technology is not going to move backward. More and more of our world will be controlled by software. It’s already become so ubiquitous that, argues one of my colleagues, it’s now ridiculous to call some firms as “tech” companies when all companies depend on it so much.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #automation #economy #future #imported:pinboard #jobs #software #technology #to:fb #work&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:32396</guid>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>jobs</category>
      <category>software</category>
      <category>technology</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
      <category>work</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How the internet is making us poor – Quartz</title>
      <link>http://qz.com/67323/how-the-internet-made-us-poor</link>
      <description>Barring a civilization-ending event, technology is not going to move backward. More and more of our world will be controlled by software. It’s already become so ubiquitous that, argues one of my colleagues, it’s now ridiculous to call some firms as “tech” companies when all companies depend on it so much.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #automation #economy #future #jobs #software #technology #to:fb #work&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:23518</guid>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>future</category>
      <category>jobs</category>
      <category>software</category>
      <category>technology</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
      <category>work</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Daily Kos: Elizabeth Warren: &#39;Why aren’t we rebuilding America?&#39;</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/28/1114390/-Elizabeth-Warren-Why-aren-t-we-rebuilding-America</link>
      <description>It really is that simple. The nation&#39;s roads, bridges, electrical grid, water systems, national parks—the whole infrastructure—is crumbling. At the same time unemployment remains persistently high. Put people to work fixing the stuff that&#39;s broken. It&#39;s not rocket science.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be that simple, except for a Republican Party that won&#39;t do what&#39;s best for the country, won&#39;t attempt to fix these things because fixing these things might help reelect President Obama and Democrats in Congress. Furthermore, making the country work proves that government works, and Republicans want none of that.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #economy #imported:pinboard #jobs #politics #to:fb #warren&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:22385</guid>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>jobs</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
      <category>warren</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment Rate Without Government Cuts: 7.1% - Real Time Economics - WSJ</title>
      <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2012/05/08/unemployment-rate-without-government-cuts-7-1/</link>
      <description>One reason the unemployment rate may have remained persistently high: The sharp cuts in state and local government spending in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and the layoffs those cuts wrought.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #duh #economy #imported:pinboard #politics #to:fb&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:32867</guid>
      <category>duh</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>imported:pinboard</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unemployment Rate Without Government Cuts: 7.1% - Real Time Economics - WSJ</title>
      <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2012/05/08/unemployment-rate-without-government-cuts-7-1</link>
      <description>One reason the unemployment rate may have remained persistently high: The sharp cuts in state and local government spending in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and the layoffs those cuts wrought.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #duh #economy #politics #to:fb&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:21714</guid>
      <category>duh</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>to:fb</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nobody Understands Debt - NYTimes.com</title>
      <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/opinion/krugman-nobody-understands-debt.html?_r=2</link>
      <description>So yes, debt matters. But right now, other things matter more. We need more, not less, government spending to get us out of our unemployment trap. And the wrongheaded, ill-informed obsession with debt is standing in the way.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #debt #economy #money #politics&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:20365</guid>
      <category>debt</category>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>money</category>
      <category>politics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Daily Kos: John McCain is worried House Republicans are making the entire Republican Party look bad</title>
      <link>http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/21/1047366/-John-McCain-is-worried-House-Republicans-are-making-the-entire-Republican-Party-look-bad?via=blog_1</link>
      <description>But whether John McCain or House Republicans have done or are doing more damage to the Republican Party isn&#39;t something that most people care about. What they care about is making sure that Congress doesn&#39;t raise their taxes while the economy is still in recovery. And if Republicans cared more about that, we wouldn&#39;t be facing this stalemate now. The American public would be better off, and so would the GOP.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #economy #politics #republicans&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:20279</guid>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>republicans</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walmart Heirs Worth Same Amount As Bottom 30 Percent Of Americans In 2007: Analysis</title>
      <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/08/walmart-heirs_n_1137492.html?comm_ref=false&amp;ref=fb&amp;src=sp#sb=2466791,b=facebook</link>
      <description>The six children of Walmart&#39;s founders, Sam and James &#34;Bud&#34; Walton, had the same net worth in 2007 as the entire bottom 30 percent of American earners, according to an analysis from Sylvia Allegretto, a labor economist at University of California-Berkeley&#39;s Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #economy #politics #walmart #wealthinequality #wtf&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:20187</guid>
      <category>economy</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>walmart</category>
      <category>wealthinequality</category>
      <category>wtf</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
