<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #dotviz</title>
    <link>/tags/dotviz/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #dotviz</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Using GraphViz for CLAUDE.md</title>
      <link>https://blog.fsck.com/2025/09/29/using-graphviz-for-claudemd/</link>
      <description>One of the things that I thought they said during the talk was that they were using .dot (GraphViz) as the language that they are using as the formalization for new processes for their coding agent. It made sense to me. There&#39;s enough dot on the Internet that models can read and understand it quite well. And it removes a whole bunch of the ambiguity of English language specifications.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ai #claude #dev #dotviz #llms #process&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:37767</guid>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>dev</category>
      <category>dotviz</category>
      <category>llms</category>
      <category>process</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
