<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #ajaxwrite</title>
    <link>/tags/ajaxwrite/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #ajaxwrite</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Continuing Intermittent Incoherency » ajaxWrong</title>
      <link>http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=551</link>
      <description>&#34;A XUL app being billed as “Ajax” is just as laughable as a Flex or XAML app suddenly growing the same moniker. That it’s Mozilla’s walled-garden language doesn’t really excuse the gaffe.&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ajax #ajaxwrite #morons #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:6717</guid>
      <category>ajax</category>
      <category>ajaxwrite</category>
      <category>morons</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SitePoint Blogs - Is AJAX Cross-Browser?</title>
      <link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/24/is-ajax-cross-browser</link>
      <description>&#34;Rather than using cross-browser DHTML like Writely, ajaxWrite uses Extensible User Interface Language (XUL), which means it will only work on Mozilla browsers like Firefox. Alex Russell believes that advertising such an application using the AJAX name is&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #ajax #ajaxwrite #xul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:6715</guid>
      <category>ajax</category>
      <category>ajaxwrite</category>
      <category>xul</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
