<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>links.lmorchard.com - #2004</title>
    <link>/tags/2004/</link>
    <description>Recent bookmarks tagged #2004</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>It feels like 2004 again. - Anil Dash</title>
      <link>https://www.anildash.com/2024/10/15/its-2004-again/</link>
      <description>I keep having a conversation with people around the tech world about how the industry’s current state of change — especially the potential disruption of incumbents — feels like nothing so much as a cyclical repeat of what we saw in 2004.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #2004 #goodinternet #web #webdev&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:30423</guid>
      <category>2004</category>
      <category>goodinternet</category>
      <category>web</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rands In Repose: A Del.icio.us Interview</title>
      <link>http://www.randsinrepose.com/archives/2004/12/03/a_delicious_interview.html</link>
      <description>Do you remember the days when del.icio.us had 30k users and rapid feature development?  &#34;The original headline for this article hit me last week in a post-Turkey haze… laying on the couch… staring at the ceiling in the living room — “Why Del.icio.us is more important than Google”. Let’s hear it for SENSATIONALISM! Woo-hoo!&#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #2004 #delicious #google&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:11897</guid>
      <category>2004</category>
      <category>delicious</category>
      <category>google</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Defining Bush&#39;s &#34;Mandate&#34;</title>
      <link>http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2001</link>
      <description>&#34;Winning 51 percent of the popular vote in Tuesday&#39;s election , Bush administration officials were quick to declare that the results constitute a &#34;mandate&#34; for Bush&#39;s second term. This interpretation of the election caught hold in the mainstream media-- a sign perhaps that White House spin was triumphing over the actual numbers recorded on Election Day. &#34;&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; #2004 #bush #mandate #obama #politics&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">linkding-ssg:bookmark:11636</guid>
      <category>2004</category>
      <category>bush</category>
      <category>mandate</category>
      <category>obama</category>
      <category>politics</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
